Real Info

Teachers Affairs => TET News & Jobs => Topic started by: BENIPAL on August 12, 2012, 12:40:13 AM

Title: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: BENIPAL on August 12, 2012, 12:40:13 AM
share your veiws ::)

I think it is on the test merit base like SSA 2010
it is the best way of selection
there is no merit of B.ED. ,B.A., M.A. etc.
because  every university has different evaluation system and syllabus
patiala university ,lovely university, OTHER OUT of STATE UNIVERSITIES gives more
marks there one more difference is PRIVATE COLLEGE gives more marks
NOW GOVT. STARTED THE PSTET
SO MERIT SHOULD BE BASED ON PSTET MARKS

Title: Re: Weightage criterion for evaluation of merit for various posts of master
Post by: surjit on August 12, 2012, 10:50:31 AM
u r right benipal g par fir v es trike nal merit bnaun te v ona loka nu jyada benifate milega jina ne punjab to bahar dia universities to b.Ed ,b.a ,m.a kiti hai kyu ki ona di % bahut jyada hundi hai te g.n.d.u di bahut kat.
Title: Re: Weightage criterion for evaluation of merit for various posts of master
Post by: BENIPAL on August 12, 2012, 12:36:27 PM
so merit must be based on pstet marks only.
Title: Re: Weightage criterion for evaluation of merit for various posts of master
Post by: surjit on August 12, 2012, 05:09:11 PM
yes u r right tusi bilkul theek keha.
Title: Re: Weightage criterion for evaluation of merit for various posts of mastershould be based on PSTET
Post by: m-nahal on August 14, 2012, 07:55:25 AM
Posts of Masters in Hindi/ Punjabi/ Science/ Maths/ Social Studies/ Agriculture/ Home Sc./ Sanskrit/ Urdu
Basic Qualification 25%
Professional Qualification 25%
TET Paper 2 30%
Higher MA/M. Sc./ M Ed In concerned subject 10%
M. Phil./ Ph. D. 10% /10 marks
  eh hai criterion
Title: Re: Weightage criterion for evaluation of merit for various posts of mastershould be based on PSTET
Post by: boparai on August 14, 2012, 12:27:37 PM
kite v koi test hove ta merit test de base te hi bande hai eh rule tet vich v laagu hove
Title: Re: Weightage criterion for evaluation of merit for various posts of mastershould be based on PSTET
Post by: m-nahal on August 14, 2012, 07:34:21 PM
hona ta chahida but 3442 vali list upper vale creterion naal ee bani aa
Title: Re: Weightage criterion for evaluation of merit for various posts of mastershould be based on PSTET
Post by: BENIPAL on August 14, 2012, 10:36:31 PM
UT ssa ne tet nu 50% weightage diti hai
but in PUNJAB govt ne
tet nu 30% weightage diti hai it is not good criteria
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: BENIPAL on September 13, 2012, 11:16:12 PM
Pstet nu 80% weightage milni chaidi hai
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: SHIVRAJ DHILLON on September 13, 2012, 11:52:22 PM
definitly merit should on the bases of PSTET only higher education  should given weightage with PSTET marks
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: BENIPAL on September 15, 2012, 10:27:21 PM
Punjab ch har sal 50,000 student b.ed pass karde han
jis vich 10,000 student de 80% marks hude han
private clg b.ed bussiness
but PSTET 250,000 student appear hoe
80% ek student de aye
so give pstet weigtage not b.ed
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: harsh kumar bhalla on September 16, 2012, 08:08:41 AM
gud point , main kafi clgs dass sakda kithe dummy admissions huniyaan ne , na clg jana ,na tp mpercentae tuhadi marzi di
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: BENIPAL on September 18, 2012, 12:33:23 PM
UPSC, PPSC, SSC, FCI, BANKS SAB TEST DE BASE TE JOB MILDI HAI
EDUCATION DEPARTMENT NU CHAIDA KI O V PSTET NU 80% WEIGHTAGE
DEN NA B.A. AND B.ED. NU
PSTET 80%
M.A. 10%
MPHIL/PHD. 5% AND 5%
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: gurjas on September 18, 2012, 01:23:44 PM
sir j oh ptet nu weightage da criteria banan lag pai ta phir ih sari discussion he muk jave nale quantity d jagah quality age ave
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: BENIPAL on September 19, 2012, 11:24:50 PM
in Gujarat, 70 per cent weightage will be given to marks scored in the Teachers Aptitute test while 30 per cent weightage would be given to the educational qualification of the candidate.
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: BENIPAL on September 21, 2012, 04:28:22 PM
UPTET CANDIDATES DEMAND FOR MERIT SHOULD BE BASED ON UPTET  :)
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: surjit on September 22, 2012, 10:08:33 AM
kise nu pta a k jive m.phil ja m.ed cho koi ek pass hove ta 5percent marks milde ne j enj hi koi m.phil m.ed di jga n e t vadia no. nal clear a ta osde v 5percent hi milde ne plz tell me?
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: BENIPAL on September 22, 2012, 10:39:39 AM
dear
M.A. /M.Ed 10%
Mphil 5%
Phd 5%
Net no marks
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: surjit on September 23, 2012, 05:10:54 PM
j m.ed nu m. a de equal maneya gya a ta fir n e t nu m.phil de kyu ni ?
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: BENIPAL on September 23, 2012, 05:31:50 PM
There should be Net/Mphil =5% hone chaide ne
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: BENIPAL on September 25, 2012, 10:58:20 PM
PPSC CH RECRUITMENT DIRECT KYO NAI HUNDI
TEST BASE TE KYO HUNDI HAI?
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: BENIPAL on October 05, 2012, 09:37:12 PM
HIMANCHAL PRADESH TET- टीईटी पास ही बनेंगे जेबीटी शिक्षक
हिमाचल प्रदेश में जेबीटी शिक्षकों की भर्ती के लिए नए नियम तैयार कर दिए गए हैं। विभाग के नए नियमों में टीईटी (टीचर एलिजीबिल्टी टेस्ट) की अनिवार्यता को लागू किया है। इसके तहत जेबीटी शिक्षक बनने के लिए भविष्य में टीईटी पास करना जरूरी होगा। टीईटी की मेरिट के आधार पर ही जेबीटी शिक्षकों को प्राथमिकता के आधार पर नियुक्तियां दी जानी हैं। इनकी मेरिट जिले के आधार पर ही बनेगी।

जिले में जितनी सीटें खाली होंगी, उतनी सीटों के लिए मेरिट टीईटी में हासिल अंकों से तैयार की जाएगी। विभाग के प्रस्ताव को शीघ्र ही सरकार से मंजूरी मिलनी प्रस्तावित है। इसके बाद जेबीटी शिक्षक बनने के लिए पहली बार टीईटी की मेरिट को आधार बनाया जाएगा। प्रदेश में पहले दो साल जेबीटी प्रशिक्षण हासिल करने वाले प्रशिक्षुओं को बैच के आधार पर ही तैनाती दी जाती रही है।

शिक्षा का अधिकार कानून लागू होने के बाद विभाग ने टीईटी की शर्त को लागू किया है। इस मसले में चालू बैच को छूट देने का मामला विभाग ने तीन बार केंद्र सरकार से उठाया। एक बार प्रदेश के मुख्यमंत्री ने केंद्रीय मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालय से उठाया था। इन प्रस्तावों पर जब सरकार को छूट नहीं मिली तो विभाग ने अब अपना नए भर्ती नियमों का प्रस्ताव तैयार किया है। इसमें पहली बार टीईटी की शर्त को शामिल किया है। इन नियमों के बाद पहली बार विभाग ने टीईटी की परीक्षा करवाकर भर्ती करने की तैयारी शुरू कर दी है।

निदेशक एलीमेंटरी शिक्षा राजीव शर्मा ने माना कि टीईटी की शर्त को शामिल कर जेबीटी भर्ती के नियम तैयार किए हैं। इसे शीघ्र ही सरकार से मंजूरी मिलने के इंतजार है। इसके बाद टीईटी की परीक्षा का रिजल्ट आते ही जेबीटी प्रशिक्षुओं को नए नियमों के आधार पर तैनाती दी जाएगी।

Source-Amar Ujala
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: BENIPAL on October 05, 2012, 09:48:10 PM
UPTET- टीईटी मैरिट के आधार पर हो शिक्षक भर्ती
टीईटी मैरिट के आधार पर हो शिक्षक भर्ती


टीईटी मैरिट के आधार पर हो शिक्षक भर्ती
रामपुर । टीईटी उत्तीण अभ्यर्थी जुलूस लेकर सपा कार्यालय पहुंचे और संसदीय कार्य एवं नगर विकास मंत्री आजम खां को ज्ञापन सौंपा, जिसमें टीईटी की मैरिट के आधार पर शिक्षक भर्ती की मांग की है।
टीईटी उत्तीण अभ्यर्थी शनिवार को अंबेडकर पार्क में एकत्र हुए। उन्होंने अपनी समस्याओं पर चर्चा की और समाधान कराने पर जोर दिया। बाद में नारेबाजी करते हुए वे हाईवे पर आ गए और जुलूस लेकर चल पड़े। वे जौहर रोड, गांधी समाधि और स्वार अड्डे होकर सपा कार्यालय पहुंचे। उन्होंने कैबिनेट मंत्री से मुलाकात की और अपनी समस्याएं रखीं। ज्ञापन भी सौंपा, जिसमें कहा है कि 12 जुलाई को लखनऊ में धरना दिया गया था। तब वार्ता के लिए बुलाया गया था, लेकिन नहीं जा सके, जो हमारी बड़ी भूल है। लेकिन हमारी इस नादानी की सजा हमारे बच्चों को न दी जाए। हमें माफ करते हुए खुले दिल से फैसला लें। पहले यूपी बोर्ड से हाई स्कूल, इंटर का रिजल्ट का प्रतिशत कम रहता था। विश्वविद्यालय में मूल्यांकन की पद्धति भी भिन्न थी। टीईटी की परीक्षा में अभ्यर्थियों को समान प्रश्नपत्र समान समय में हल करना था। इसलिए मैरिट के अनुसार चयन ही सभी समानता का आधार प्रदान करेगा।
इस दौरान शहजाद हुसैन, संजीव चंदेल, प्रियंका त्यागी, राजपाल सिंह यादव, नईमउद्दीन, किशन सिंह, तेजपाल त्यागी, विजेन्द्र कुमार, महीपाल सिंह, मोहम्मद तसलीम आदि शामिल रहे।
शफी अहमद
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: BENIPAL on October 05, 2012, 09:58:31 PM
UPTET- टीईटी मेरिट पर चयन को अड़े अभ्यर्थी


टीईटी मेरिट पर चयन को अड़े अभ्यर्थी
ज्योतिबा फुले नगर ।
टीईटी उत्तीर्ण अभ्यर्थी टीईटी मेरिट के आधार पर ही चयन को अड़ गए हैं। टीईटी अभ्यर्थियों ने उन्होंने सरकार से टीईटी मेरिट पर ही चयन करने की मांग की है। साथ ही टीईटी उत्तीर्ण अभ्यर्थियों से एकजुटता का भी आह्वान किया।
रविवार को अम्बेडकर पार्क में आयोजित टीईटी उत्तीर्ण संघर्ष मोर्चा की बैठक में 23 जुलाई को होने वाली केबिनेट की मीटिंग में आने वाले निर्णय पर चर्चा की गई। संयोजक राजेंद्र सिंह ने टीईटी मेरिट के आधार पर ही अभ्यर्थियों का प्राइमरी स्कूलों में सहायक अध्यापक के पद पर चयन किए जाने की सरकार से मांग की गई। इस दौरान सतीश कुमार ने कहा कि राज्य सरकार टीईटी को निरस्त न करे बल्कि टीईटी की मेरिट के आधार पर अभ्यर्थियों का प्राइमरी स्कूलों में सहायक अध्यापक के पद पर चयन करे। सौरभ सक्सेना ने कहा कि यदि सरकार टीईटी की मेरिट के अतिरिक्त कोई निर्णय लेती है तो सरकार के निर्णय के विरूद्ध टीईटी उत्तीर्ण अभ्यर्थी कोर्ट का दरवाजा खटखटाने से भी पीछे नहीं हटेंगे। बैठक में मनोज गौतम, चेतन स्वरूप, पंकज कुमार, विश्वकांत, गोविंद कुमार, नीरज सैनी, मनोज कुमार, अनवर हुसैन, अनीस अहमद, सलीमुद्दीन, विपिन कुमार, जावेद अख्तर, रजनीश कुमार, अशोक कुमार, राजवीर सिंह, कर्मवीर सिंह, सुखवीर सिंह, विवेक कुमार आदि मौजूद रहे।
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: BENIPAL on October 10, 2012, 06:54:22 PM
काफी  सारे मामलों में कोर्ट ने स्पष्ट किया की -
टी ई टी अंकों से भर्ती  सराहनीय   है  क्योकि इससे पक्षपात रहित भर्ती होती है , विद्यार्थी चाहे किसी भी बोर्ड के हो , चाहे उनके कितने भी प्रतिशत अंक हो , टी.इ. टी. सारे विद्यार्थियों के लिए समान है  और कोई नियम का उल्लंघन  नहीं हुआ है , पर  मीडिया  इन   सब  खबरों  से दूर  है कारण - बहुमत टी ई टी फेल  वालों व  अन्य  के साथ  है
सच  को झूठ  व झूठ को सच  में   बदलना असली  खेल है
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: BENIPAL on October 10, 2012, 07:04:53 PM
Many Candidates trapped with forged Marksheets from Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, Bhopal and Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi for BTC Selection, Criminal Cases put against them

Allahabad Highcourt Suggests TET Exam is a good process for Selections -
We are pleased to note that the system of Teachers' Eligibility Test (TET) examination has been introduced as that will also check dishonest, unqualified candidates with forged degrees securing easy entry into teachers education courses and thereby securing teaching jobs.

*******************
See Case Details
*********************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 46


Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18498 of 2011
Petitioner :- Sachin Rana And Anr.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Ram Raj Pandey
Respondent Counsel :- Govt. Advocate
Connected with
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION NO. 18572 of 2011
Petitioner: Nirbhay Singh
Respondent: State of UP and others
Petitioner Counsel : Rajeev Chaddha
Respondent Counsel: Govt Advocate

Hon'ble Amar Saran,J.
Hon'ble Kalimullah Khan,J.
Heard Shri D.R. Chaudhary, learned Government Advocate assisted by Shri Vimlendu Tripathi, learned Additional Government Advocate.
This order will apply to all the connected writ petitions. However, the present Writ petition No. 18498/2011 (District Baghpat) preferred by Sachin Rana and others and Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 18572 of 2011, (District Ghaziabad) preferred by Nirbhay Singh shall be treated as the leading petitions.
This case relates to the scam of obtaining fake mark sheets from the Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, Bhopal and the Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi for the purpose of getting admission in B.T.C. courses for securing government jobs of primary school teachers.
Pursuant to our earlier order dated 11.10.2011, affidavits of compliance dated 14.11.2011 have been filed on behalf of the Director General of Police , Headquarters, UP, Lucknow and on behalf of SHO Baraut, district Baghpat and affidavit dated 15.11.2011 filed on behalf of the State of UP and SHO, PS Hapur Nagar, district Ghaziabad in the two leading petitions.
Two investigating officers from the two districts, Baghpat (P.S. Baraut) and Ghazaibad (P.S. Hapur Nagar) are present. The Director, Basic Education, U.P. is also present in Court pursuant to the earlier order.
The affidavit of the Director General of Police, UP shows that a letter dated 2.11.2011 has been issued by the DGP directing the Inspector General of Police, Meerut Region, Meerut to ensure that strict and fair investigation be carried out in pursuance of the order of this Court dated 11.10.2011. Consequently, letters have been issued by the Inspector General of Police, Meerut Region, Meerut dated 2/3.11.2011 to the SP, Baghpat and the SP, Panchsheel Nagar for strict and fair investigation in the matter. The Director General, Public Grievance has also written a letter to the SSP, Ghaziabad to the same effect.
The affidavit of the Investigating officer, PS Baraut (Baghpat) shows that as per the list supplied by the Principal, DIET, forged certificates/ mark sheets of 18 candidates whose certificates were purportedly issued by the Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, Bhopal and 59 candidates, whose certificates were purportedly issued by the Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi, i.e a total of 77 mark sheets have been found to be forged. The affidavit of SI of PS Hapur Nagar, district Ghaziabad shows that 49 cases have been registered at police station Hapur Nagar, district Ghaziabad, now district Panchsheel Nagar. Out of these 49 cases, 37 cases relate to forged and fabricated mark sheets issued by the Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, Bhopal, whereas 12 cases pertain to forged and fabricated mark sheets issued by the Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi. This affidavit further mentions that the CBCID is investigating the case against the employees of Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi, namely Mihir Mishra, posted as Satyapan Sahayak and Vijay Shankar Shukla, Assistant Sub-Registrar (Examination) at case crime No. 69 of 2011, under sections 467, 468 and 471 IPC, PS Chetganj, district Varanasi for issuing fabricated and fake mark sheets. Investigation has been completed or is nearing completion in most of the cases and the charge sheets are ready.
We think that the magnitude of this problem as seen in the 49 cases relating to district Ghaziabad and 77 cases relating to district Baghpat (i.e. a total of 126 cases) suggests that the problem of getting admissions to BTC courses on the basis of forged and fabricated mark sheets has assumed the nature of a scam.
It has begun to appear to this Court that now it is becoming a rarity for candidates try to get admissions to BTC courses in a bona fide manner on the basis of genuine mark sheets, and that trying to get admission to BTC courses on the basis of forged and fabricated mark sheets seems to be looked upon as a very normal and legitimate activity. For this purpose the candidates actively collude with some employees of the Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, Bhopal and Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi.
The modus operandi of the dishonest officials at the Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi and the Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, Bhopal appears to be that they issue forged mark sheets by substituting the names of applicants who may be ingratiating or bribing them, which relate to roll numbers of other persons, who have actually written the examinations, and have obtained the marks shown. Thereafter the dishonest officials sitting in the Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi and the Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, Bhopal issue certificates certifying that the candidate concerned has actually written the examination and the certificate relates to him. This fact is usually verified by the corrupt officials at the desk at the Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi and the Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, Bhopa when the enquiry is initially made from them, and consequently the dishonest candidates have even succeeded in obtaining admission to the BTC course. Only when a verification was made from the Principals of the concerned colleges whether the named candidates had indeed written the examinations, it was found that the roll numbers on the mark sheets related to other persons and not the petitioners and the other accused at all.
The result is that deserving candidates, who may have qualified on merit loose out their right to admission to BTC courses and consequent employment opportunities to these fraudsters who are engaged in such grave frauds. The standard of teaching in primary education has accordingly declined. There is also great teacher absenteeism in primary schools because there is no honest commitment to their jobs of such teachers who obtain admission to BTC courses and thereafter secure teaching jobs in primary schools on the strength of forged degrees and certificates and consequent failure of teaching at the primary level which is the foundation for a child's education, with grave loss to the child, the society and the nation.
This Court will be failing in its duty if it does not recommend coming down with a heavy hand and taking strict action against the culprits engaged in manufacturing or using forged mark sheets for obtaining admissions to BTC courses.
We also anticipate that some middlemen may be involved, who do not appear to have been identified as yet probably because many orders staying arrests were obtained by candidates seeking admission to BTC courses, on the basis of forged and fabricated mark sheets, in these and connected writ petitions, hence the said candidates could not be interrogated to find out the names of the middlemen involved in promoting these malpractices. As the investigations of the cases against most of the writ petitioners appear to have been completed or are nearing completion, and the interrogation of the accused appears to be imperative for identifying these middle men and other accused who may be conspirators or actors of this larger conspiracy, the orders staying arrests in all the connections petitions are forthwith vacated.
As indicated above the CBCID is also investigating the matter relating to the officials of the Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi, who are involved in this crime, we direct that the investigation in all these connected petitions whether they relate to Ghaziabad, Baghpat, Varanasi or any other district to be transferred to the same CB CID investigating agency so that the scam (and the various offenders involved therein) may be unearthed in its totality. Coercive measures may also be taken against the concerned candidates and officials of the Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi and Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, Bhopal, so that they may be interrogated and the middlemen involved in facilitating this offence may be identified.
We also direct that the investigation may be expeditiously concluded by the CB CID against all the accused persons preferably in a period of 3 months.
Here we would like to record our appreciation of the learned Government Advocate Sri D.R. Chaudhary and the AGA, Sri Vimalendu Tripathi, and for their positive suggestions in this non-adversarial litigation and support to the Court in its pious mission of tackling this grave menace of securing admissions to BTC courses by persons relying on forged mark sheets. He was readily agreeable and raised no objection to the investigation being conducted in its totality by the CB CID as directed by the Court.
Looking to the wide language of Article 226 of the Constitution we think that as substantial parts of the cause of action has arisen in the State of UP, where the candidates are applying for admission to the BTC course, there should be no impediment for this Court directing the CBCID to investigate the offences committed by the concerned officials of the Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi and also by the concerned officials of the Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, Bhopal, M.P.
But we make it clear that if we are not satisfied with the investigation by the CB CID, or the CB CID faces some impediment in investigating the matter against the accused and middle men (if any) connected with the Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal Bhopal who may also be involved in the crime., the Court may have no option but to transfer the entire investigation to the CBI on some future date.
In any case we are of the opinion that there is no impediment on the DGP or IG (Public Grievances), U.P. communicating with their counterparts in the State of M.P. for carrying out a joint investigation in this case and accordingly we issue a mandamus to the said authorities to comply with this direction. We also direct the Secretaries of Basic, Secondary or Higher Education, U.P., whatever may be applicable, to also communicate with their counterparts in M.P. for ensuring that this problem is jointly investigated and measures for checking the problem are put in place both in M.P and U.P.
We also think it advisable and accordingly direct the Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi and the Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, Bhopal and other examining/ certificate awarding bodies which conduct examinations or issue certificates relating to High School, Intermediate, Graduation and Post Graduation degrees to develop appropriate software for uploading information of the candidates who have actually written the examinations, their parentage and address, date of birth, the year of the examination, the centre from where the examination was written, division and marks obtained, and other relevant details on the website, so that imposters cannot claim to have acquired the said marks by falsely substituting themselves in place of the genuine students in the mark sheets relating to bona fide candidates in collusion with some dishonest examining/ certificate issuing body employees. If possible scanned or digital photographs of the candidates should also be placed on the website. We may mention that by this computerization process, it would be much easier to verify whether any wrong candidate has been able to secure admission to BTC courses or to have obtained job in the said sector on the basis of non-existent or forged mark sheet, which relates to another person.
We are pleased to note that the system of Teachers' Eligibility Test (TET) examination has been introduced as that will also check dishonest, unqualified candidates with forged degrees securing easy entry into teachers education courses and thereby securing teaching jobs.


Similar information regarding all the teaching and non-teaching employees of the Primary, Secondary and Higher Education sector along with photographs, if possible, containing the aforesaid data may also be uploaded on the website, so that unqualified persons working on these teaching jobs on the basis of forged degrees may be identified and removed from their jobs and criminally prosecuted.
Information regarding the different courses offered by the different institutions and their equivalence with other degrees should also be mentioned on the net.
The concerned secretaries and police heads must also take steps for checking other frauds such as the reported practice of transferred employees drawing salaries at the existing place whilst also drawing salaries at the transferred place of work, or another fraudulent person receiving the double salary at the new place of work in the name of the employee on the rolls, by placing information regarding the transfer of the employee on the net and taking other relevant measures and they shall also apprise the Court regarding these other frauds and scams in the education sector on the next date, so that appropriate directions may be issued.
We would like the concerned Education Secretary to take the aforesaid suggestions into consideration for issuing appropriate orders and apprise this Court by the next listing about the steps taken for carrying out the recommendations made hereinabove.
We would like to get a complete report from the investigating agency regarding the progress of investigation and whether the accused persons have been arrested and whether any additional accused persons, such as the middlemen, who have brought about a link between the candidates and the educational bodies, such as Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi and the Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, Bhopal or other bodies and the progress in submission of the charge sheets.
We would like the investigating officer of CB CID entrusted with the investigation as well as his supervisory superior officer of CBCID and also a senior person in the concerned department of Education to appear in this Court for reporting compliance and for informing this Court regarding the progress of investigation and also with regard to the steps taken for placing data on the web site, for improving inter-state co-ordination and carrying out other directions given in the present and earlier orders.
List this case on 16.1.2012 for submission of compliance/ progress reports as directed hereinabove. Orders staying arrests in these petitions as well as in all connected petitions are hereby vacated. On the next date the registry is directed to list these petitions as Criminal PILs.
Order Date :- 15.11.2011
Ishrat


SO MERIT SHOULD BE BASED ON PSTET
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: BENIPAL on October 12, 2012, 07:12:07 PM
TNTET : Selection Process Through TNTET (Tamilnadu Teachers Eligibility Test )

 60% Weightage of TET marks in selection process
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: JKM on October 12, 2012, 08:46:59 PM
SIR HUN SAARE 5178 POSTS DI HI GAL KAR RAHE HUN 3442 BARE V KUCH DASO K US DA KI BANEYA PLS
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: BENIPAL on October 12, 2012, 09:20:14 PM
SIR HUN SAARE 5178 POSTS DI HI GAL KAR RAHE HUN 3442 BARE V KUCH DASO K US DA KI BANEYA PLS
15 oct tak new lista upload honia ne
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: BENIPAL on October 18, 2012, 02:01:43 AM
pstest solve the problem of
diffrent universities evaluation system and private clgs
test give same evaluation system for all so merit should be based on pstet 
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: BENIPAL on October 24, 2012, 01:40:53 PM
PSTET BASE MERIT SOLVE ALL PROBLEM
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: gurjas on October 28, 2012, 02:31:01 PM
sahi keha
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: ASHOK PUNIA on October 28, 2012, 03:47:41 PM
PSTET BASE MERIT SOLVE ALL PROBLEM

B.ED BATCH SYSTEM IS SOLVE OF ALL PROBLEMS.
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: BENIPAL on October 28, 2012, 04:34:51 PM
PSTET is MANDATARY
So batch system based on PSTET
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: BENIPAL on November 27, 2012, 01:52:20 PM
Teachers Selection Through UPTET Merit

Even a case is running in court, It is a fault of system , Who issued such advertisement and play with the life of candidates. Only culprit / convicted / guilty should be punished. TET Merit a equal chance for every candidates to perform on a common platform and eliminates Nakal Mafia System , Bogus University, Disparity among different boards/universities.
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: sanjay asija on October 04, 2015, 08:30:46 PM
Bilkul sahi hah eh rules candidates ke liye janlewa hi hah pb education recruitment bilkul hi galat hah actually merit tet plus tet qualify ka subject test laker bnani chahiye esmi koi qualification nhi add nhi karni chahiye kyunki enka parameter ek jaisa nhi hah different session main different universities se degrees camparison nhi ho sakta kon samjhaye pagal sarkar ke experts ko jo rule bnate hah
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: priya123 on October 07, 2015, 03:16:59 PM
Ki kade eh higher qul. Creteria te case ni hoya? Je hoya ta result ki nikleya?
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: sanjay asija on October 07, 2015, 06:53:25 PM
Priya jee ye rule badlate rehte hah lekin ye kisi ko suit karte hah or kisi ke liye dukhdayi hote hah jo deserving hote hah unko sabse jyada loss hota hah
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: priya123 on October 07, 2015, 08:26:06 PM
To kya iss base pe writ nai ho skti?
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: sanjay asija on October 07, 2015, 08:35:52 PM
Ho sakti hah kyon nhi ho sakti es var lag reha hah jenve pstet nhi hona haje tak koi adv ja online application nhi mangia gayiya na hi books mil rhi market ch means books publish nji hoyiya
Title: Re: Weightage criterion should be based on PSTET marks and HIGHER Education only
Post by: raj on February 29, 2016, 09:07:43 AM
ANY CANDIDATE WHO GET WRONG QUESTION BOOKLET (DIFFERENT SET) /MISPRINT QUESTION BOOKLET / DAMAGED QUESTION BOOKLET/ OVERWRITTEN QUESTIONS IN QUESTION BOOKLET ETC. IN PSTET-1 OR 2 POST HERE ABOUT YOUR DISCREPANCY ,AND RESOLUTION YOU GET IMMEDIATELY FROM THE DUTY STAFF
WE SHOULD UNITE ,THEIR MAY BE LEGAL WAY FOR ALL SUCH CANDIDATES...