Author Topic: Koei v sarkari emp Aarji (Contractual)nahi ho sakda :HC Rajasthan  (Read 838 times)

Gaurav Rathore

  • News Editor
  • *****
  • Offline
  • Posts: 5192
  • Gender: Male
  • Australian Munda
    • View Profile

PATIALA CITY

  • News Caster
  • *****
  • Offline
  • Posts: 5318
  • Gender: Female
  • Lecturer history
    • View Profile
Re: Koei v sarkari emp Aarji (Contractual)nahi ho sakda :HC Rajasthan
« Reply #1 on: June 15, 2015, 01:31:03 PM »
 i appreciate ths...
good step

vineysharma68

  • Guest
Re: Koei v sarkari emp Aarji (Contractual)nahi ho sakda :HC Rajasthan
« Reply #2 on: June 15, 2015, 01:34:09 PM »
very good news

Gaurav Rathore

  • News Editor
  • *****
  • Offline
  • Posts: 5192
  • Gender: Male
  • Australian Munda
    • View Profile
Re: Koei v sarkari emp Aarji (Contractual)nahi ho sakda :HC Rajasthan
« Reply #3 on: June 15, 2015, 01:35:00 PM »
Thanks patiala city and vinay ji

Gaurav Rathore

  • News Editor
  • *****
  • Offline
  • Posts: 5192
  • Gender: Male
  • Australian Munda
    • View Profile
Re: Koei v sarkari emp Aarji (Contractual)nahi ho sakda :HC Rajasthan
« Reply #4 on: June 15, 2015, 01:36:25 PM »

Gaurav Rathore

  • News Editor
  • *****
  • Offline
  • Posts: 5192
  • Gender: Male
  • Australian Munda
    • View Profile
Re: Koei v sarkari emp Aarji (Contractual)nahi ho sakda :HC Rajasthan
« Reply #5 on: June 15, 2015, 04:59:10 PM »
GOod decision

Karmveer

  • Guest
Re: Koei v sarkari emp Aarji (Contractual)nahi ho sakda :HC Rajasthan
« Reply #6 on: June 15, 2015, 07:39:44 PM »
But all these  are not  implemented in spirit

KANG MR.SINGH

  • Real Member
  • **
  • Offline
  • Posts: 451
    • View Profile
Re: Koei v sarkari emp Aarji (Contractual)nahi ho sakda :HC Rajasthan
« Reply #7 on: June 16, 2015, 09:20:14 AM »
eh kewal manjoor posts lai hai........ jo posts manjoor nahi ohna da ki a

KANG MR.SINGH

  • Real Member
  • **
  • Offline
  • Posts: 451
    • View Profile
Re: Koei v sarkari emp Aarji (Contractual)nahi ho sakda :HC Rajasthan
« Reply #8 on: June 16, 2015, 09:21:02 AM »
ssa/rmsa/mdm/picts are not manjoor

Sukhi76

  • Guest
Re: Koei v sarkari emp Aarji (Contractual)nahi ho sakda :HC Rajasthan
« Reply #9 on: June 16, 2015, 09:52:55 AM »
Absolutely correct Judgement. This is actual interpretation of Judgement given by Supreme Court in Uma Devi Case.   Hun tak Sab Govt. ne aur Deptt. ne Uma Devi waale case nu galat intemperate kita c.

Eh vi sure hai ke eh Judgement Supreme Court ch challenge hovegi   kise na kise Deptt. walo.

 

GoogleTagged



KI PRIMARY SCHOOLS VICH PEON DI POST NAHI HUNDI,SFAEE KON KARDA?

Started by GURLAL LECT PHYSICS

Replies: 11
Views: 2036
Last post April 03, 2013, 09:57:13 PM
by ~H.S.Saini~
Adhoc / contractual Employees appointed before 2004 will get Old Pension Scheme

Started by Baljit NABHA

Replies: 4
Views: 1207
Last post September 04, 2016, 03:05:04 PM
by Baljit NABHA
earned and c leaves for 3442 contractual govt. employees

Started by livia

Replies: 5
Views: 1805
Last post September 10, 2015, 07:35:57 PM
by jandi11
ki master to lect. promotions vishavar honiya chahidia han ja nahi..

Started by jagsy

Replies: 55
Views: 7997
Last post May 12, 2016, 09:23:45 AM
by rajkumar
DEPARMENT SAYING"THESE CASE NOT FOUND 1,2,3.NAHI HUNDERD.SHAME

Started by GURLAL LECT PHYSICS

Replies: 14
Views: 2090
Last post September 02, 2013, 03:44:35 PM
by GURLAL LECT PHYSICS