Author Topic: 7654 Posts of Teachers of Punjab  (Read 475197 times)

<--Jack-->

  • Editor-in-Chief
  • *****
  • Offline
  • Posts: 12285
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Real Info
    • Email
Re: 7654 Posts of Teachers of Punjab
« Reply #10 on: September 25, 2010, 02:33:50 PM »

<--Jack-->

  • Editor-in-Chief
  • *****
  • Offline
  • Posts: 12285
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Real Info
    • Email
Re: 7654 Posts of Teachers of Punjab
« Reply #11 on: September 25, 2010, 02:35:07 PM »

<--Jack-->

  • Editor-in-Chief
  • *****
  • Offline
  • Posts: 12285
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Real Info
    • Email
Re: 7654 Posts of Teachers of Punjab
« Reply #12 on: September 25, 2010, 02:35:39 PM »

<--Jack-->

  • Editor-in-Chief
  • *****
  • Offline
  • Posts: 12285
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Real Info
    • Email
Re: 7654 Posts of Teachers of Punjab
« Reply #13 on: September 25, 2010, 02:36:12 PM »

<--Jack-->

  • Editor-in-Chief
  • *****
  • Offline
  • Posts: 12285
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Real Info
    • Email
Re: 7654 Posts of Teachers of Punjab
« Reply #14 on: September 25, 2010, 02:36:43 PM »

<--Jack-->

  • Editor-in-Chief
  • *****
  • Offline
  • Posts: 12285
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Real Info
    • Email
Re: 7654 Posts of Teachers of Punjab
« Reply #15 on: September 25, 2010, 02:38:27 PM »

<--Jack-->

  • Editor-in-Chief
  • *****
  • Offline
  • Posts: 12285
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Real Info
    • Email
Re: 7654 Posts of Teachers of Punjab
« Reply #16 on: September 25, 2010, 02:39:25 PM »

<--Jack-->

  • Editor-in-Chief
  • *****
  • Offline
  • Posts: 12285
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Real Info
    • Email
Re: 7654 Posts of Teachers of Punjab
« Reply #17 on: September 25, 2010, 02:40:48 PM »

<--Jack-->

  • Editor-in-Chief
  • *****
  • Offline
  • Posts: 12285
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Real Info
    • Email
Re: 7654 Posts of Teachers of Punjab
« Reply #18 on: September 25, 2010, 02:41:59 PM »
State restrained from issuing appointment letters
Saurabh Malik/TNS

Chandigarh, July 23
Issuing notice of motion for September 9, Justice Ajai Lamba of the Punjab and Haryana High Court has restrained Punjab from issuing appointment letters to 7,654 candidates for the posts of lecturer, master and teacher in the state Education Department.

The orders came after a separate list for men and women candidates was replaced, after the completion of the selection process, by a combined merit list.

In their petition filed through Kapil Kakkar and Hema Kakkar, Jaskaran Singh and 11 other candidates had sought the quashing of a public notice dated July 9 changing the criteria for selection, after the completion of the selection process and preparation of the tentative merit list.

Kakkar said an advertisement for filling 7,654 posts on a contract basis in the teaching and non-teaching cadres in the Education Department was issued on September 23, 2009. The posts included 513 of lecturer and 3,638 in the master cadre. The advertisement said the men and women ratio would be 50:50.

The respondents in the first week of December last released a provisional merit list separately for men and women. The list included the petitioners'† †' †   '†  †''† †'    '†' '† †' †   '†' '† †' '†'    ''†  ' '† †'    '†''† †' †   '†' '† †' '†'    ''†  ' '† †'    '†'names.

In April, after the scrutiny of documents, the respondents declared that appointment orders to the newly selected 7,654 teachers would be issued within a week. State Education Minister specifically stated the recruitment process was complete and the authorities concerned had been asked to appoint the teachers on priority.

But on July 9 on the reopening of schools after the summer vacation, the petitioners awaiting appointment letters were surprised to know they had been asked to again appear for the counselling and scrutiny of documents.

They were called on the basis of a revised combined merit list of men and women candidates, which according to the respondents, was prepared on the basis of a high court decision dated January 8.

After going through the new combined merit list, the petitioners were shocked to note their merit position had been shifted down. The action of preparing a combined merit list and not adhering to the terms and conditions of the advertisement were not only illegal and arbitrary but also unjust and unfair, Kakkar concluded.

<--Jack-->

  • Editor-in-Chief
  • *****
  • Offline
  • Posts: 12285
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Real Info
    • Email
Re: 7654 Posts of Teachers of Punjab
« Reply #19 on: September 25, 2010, 03:09:24 PM »

 

GoogleTagged



Safai Abhiyan of Teachers Versus Railways """Difference""""

Started by vineysharma68

Replies: 7
Views: 3937
Last post September 29, 2014, 09:04:47 PM
by vineysharma68
2,667 primary, upper primary schools donít have enough teachers

Started by sheemar

Replies: 0
Views: 868
Last post May 05, 2017, 08:11:14 AM
by sheemar
Teachersí work hours in tech colleges increased by 2 hours a week t:

Started by SHANDAL

Replies: 0
Views: 1153
Last post May 22, 2015, 07:48:55 AM
by SHANDAL
Training of untrained in service Elementary Teachers in the Govt./Govt.Aided/una

Started by sheemar

Replies: 0
Views: 647
Last post September 08, 2017, 07:21:26 PM
by sheemar
Breaking news , Regular order of 3442 teachers uploaded on ssapunjab.org .. Cong

Started by Gaurav Rathore

Replies: 1
Views: 7217
Last post March 02, 2016, 06:00:31 PM
by Gaurav Rathore